文档库首页2026-10-27 快照 · 请以官网最新文件为准
技术评审 Technical Assessment / 历史资料 Archives / RMUC 2026 技术评审 Technical Assessment / RMUC 2026 赛季总结 Season Summary / RMUC 2026 赛季总结文档评审细则 Season Summary Documentation Assessment Criteria

RMUC 2026 赛季总结文档评审细则 Season Summary Documentation Assessment Criteria

原文:https://bbs.robomaster.com/wiki/20204847/839188 · 源站更新:2025-12-10T16:39:56.000+00:00 · 本地抓取:2026-10-27T02:58:06.194Z

注意:以下细则仅供参考,具体内容以技术评审环节所采用的最新版模板为准。

Note: The following guidelines are for reference only. The definitive requirements are those set out in the latest template applicable to the relevant technical assessment stage.

赛季总结文档评审要求

文档类型板块内容
总结文档战术传承分析开展赛后复盘会,从人员、技术、制度等方面,通过对比上赛季或本赛季初队伍情况,分析与赛季建设目标的差距及其原因,总结战队团队建设、战队传承的有效经验。
1、人员传承
1)列举团队架构成员,对比赛季初与比赛阶段队伍成员规模,分析队员离队根因和解决方案
2)列举队内老队员留存数据,例如:老队长、技术骨干等
3)分析老队员在技术、管理、培训等核心环节的具体作用,用案例或数据说明
4)分析老队员黏性原因,提出有效提高老队员留存的方案
2、技术传承
1)阐述战队发展至今长期传承的关键技术点及其发挥的作用,并分析其发展迭代情况
2)阐述队伍未能有效传承或迭代的关键技术点,分析根因
3)分析队伍保证技术传承实施的方法或措施,在技术传承的过程中的经验总结
3、流程机制
1)回顾本赛季队伍1-2个重点落实的流程机制(可以是沿用或者新推行的,包括但不限于:新人培养、团队决策、进度管理、奖惩制度、测试流程等),列出行之有效的措施及不符合预期的机制设计
2)通过案例或数据说明该制度在队内的认可度和落实情况,并分析其有效或失效的原因,并分别总结下个赛季可传承、需调整、需淘汰的机制
文化建设分析详细介绍本赛季文化建设情况,包括:
1、根据官方提供的问卷内容,进行队内调研,根据调研数据,进行文化建设情况分析
2、按照官方提供的模版,详细阐述文化人物和故事的执行情况
3、对比全赛季文化建设规划与目标,分析实际差距及其原因,总结战队文化建设相关的有效措施
项目分析对比赛季规划中设定的团队目标及各项目设置的项目目标,结合项目进度跟踪记录,分析实际差距及其原因,并给出下赛季优化措施。
基础建设复盘1、回顾本赛季可用资源与实际使用资源、备赛工具预期使用与实际使用,分析实际差距及其原因,总结资源利用及工具使用的有效经验。
2、整理填写备赛期间使用的资料文献。
3、对比本赛季项目分析、资源可用性、进度规划中预期与实际效果,分析实际差距及其原因,总结有效经验。
学术创新列举比赛相关的专利、学术文章、开源技术文献,成果数量与分数相关。

赛季总结评级标准

内容对应等级
赛季总结内容按照内容要求撰写,完整无遗漏。内容详实,能够洞察当前战队问题的本质并且给出下赛季解决方案及未来发展展望,总结经验和原因的方式较为客观,分析方法科学,下赛季战队工作有较好的指导意义,能够为其他战队的下赛季工作提供有效的经验或方法。S
赛季总结内容按照内容要求撰写,完整无遗漏。内容详实,能够洞察部分问题的本质并且给出下赛季解决方案,总结经验和原因的方式较为客观,分析方法科学,对下赛季战队工作有较好的指导意义。A
赛季总结内容按照内容要求撰写,完整无遗漏。内容较为详实,能够洞察部分问题的本质总结经验和原因的方法较为客观,对下赛季战队工作有较好的参考价值。B
赛季总结内容有少量缺失或与内容要求存在一定偏离,总结和分析内容不够详实,有一定的深入分析过程,总结经验和原因的方法部分较为客观,对下赛季战队工作有一定参考价值。C
赛季总结内容缺失严重或与内容要求偏离较大,总结和分析内容过于笼统或浮于表面,没有深入进行分析,总结经验和原因的方法不够客观,对下赛季战队工作无有效参考价值。D

Season Summary Assessment Criteria

Document TypeSectionContent
Season SummaryTeam Succession AnalysisHold post-season review
meetings to analyze the differences and causes between the team’s current
status and season development goals by comparing the situation of personnel,
technology, and systems with that of last season or the beginning of this season.
Summarize effective experiences in team building and Team heritage.
1. Personnel Succession
1) List the members of the team structure, compare the personnel size at the
beginning of the competition season with that during different stages, analyze
the underlying reasons for members leaving, and provide solutions.
2) List retention data for long-term personnel, such as former Captain and key
technical members.
3) Analyze the specific roles of veteran personnel in core tasks such as
technology, management, and training, illustrated with examples or data.
4) Analyze the factors contributing to veteran personnel retention, and propose
effective strategies to further increase veteran personnel loyalty.
2. Technical Succession
1) Describe the key technical aspects that have been consistently passed down
within the team throughout its development, explain their impact, and analyze
how these technologies have evolved and been updated over time.
2) Describe the key technical points that the team has not effectively passed on
or improved, and analyze the underlying reasons.
3) Analyze the methods or measures the team uses to ensure the implementation of
technology transfer, and summarize the lessons learned throughout the process.
3. Team Management Mechanism
1) Review 1–2 key implemented processes and mechanisms from this season for the
team - these can be existing practices or new initiatives, such as new member
development, team decision-making, progress management, reward and penalty
systems, or testing procedures. List effective measures adopted and those
mechanism designs that did not meet expectations.
2) Use case studies or data to illustrate the level of acceptance and
implementation of this system within the team, analyze the reasons for its
effectiveness or expiration, and summarize which mechanisms should be
continued, adjusted, or phased out in the next season.
Culture Development AnalysisProvide a detailed overview
of the team's cultural development this season, including:
1. Conduct an internal survey based on the official questionnaire, and analyze the
state of cultural development within the team using the survey data.
2. Provide a detailed account of how cultural figures and stories have been
implemented, following the official template.
3. Compare the overall Season Planning and objectives for cultural development
with actual results, analyze any discrepancies and their causes, and summarize
effective Team cultural development initiatives.
Project AnalysisAnalyze the actual gaps between the team objectives set in the season planning and the project objectives for each initiative, using project progress tracking records. Identify the reasons for these discrepancies and provide recommendations for optimization in the next season.
Infrastructure Review1. Review the resources and
tools actually used against the available resources and tools, analyze any
actual discrepancy and its reasons, and conclude useful experience from the
team’s utilization of resources and tools.
2. Organize and list out the materials and references used in the Preparation
Period.
Review the actual outcomes of the team’s project analysis, resource availability analysis, and progress plan against their expected outcomes, analyze any actual discrepancy and its reasons, and conclude useful experience.
Academic InnovationList the academic references used for the competition, including patents, papers, open-source technical literature, etc. The number of references provided will be taken into consideration in the assessment.

Season Summary Rating Criteria

Content RequirementsRating
The Season Summary is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Season Summary is detailed, effectively identifying the core issues of the team and providing solutions for the next season, as well as the outlook for future development. The methods used to summarize the experience and reasons are objective, and the analysis is scientific. The Summary is instructive for the team’s work in the next season and offers valuable experience or effective methods that other teams can learn from for the upcoming season.S
The Season Summary is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Season Summary is detailed, effectively identifying some of the core issues and providing solutions for the next season. The methods used to summarize the experience and reasons are objective, and the analysis is scientific. The Summary is instructive for the team’s work in the next season.A
The Season Summary is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Season Summary is detailed, effectively identifying some of the core issues. The methods used to summarize the experience and reasons are objective. The Summary is helpful for the team’s work in the next season.B
The Season Summary has minor omissions or deviates somewhat from the content requirements. The summary and analysis lack sufficient details, though an in-depth analysis is provided. The methods used to summarize the experience and reasons are partially objective. The Season Summary is useful for the team’s work in the next season.C
The Season Summary has significant omissions or deviates greatly from the content requirements. The summary and analysis are overly general or superficial, lacking in-depth analysis. The methods used to summarize the experience and reasons are not objective. The Summary is not useful for the team’s work in the next season.D


本页纯文本:839188.txt。外部附件链接需要联网。