注意：以下细则仅供参考，具体内容以技术评审环节所采用的最新版模板为准。
Note: The following guidelines are for reference only. The definitive requirements are those set out in the latest template applicable to the relevant technical assessment stage.
中期进度考核文档评审要求
| 文档类型 | 板块 | 展示内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 项目文档 | 进度安排（更新） | 1、更新机器人制作规划的实际进度，闭环验收赛季规划的关键节点完成情况，总结原因并更新后续规划 2、填写其他需要完成的内容的时间安排（例如制作场地、调试工具） 3、更新人力安排计划（例如各模块计划投入的人数和时间分配） |
| 项目分析 | 1、更新项目跟踪，对比赛季规划中的项目计划，在具体方案执行过程中跟踪闭环各模块的进度，闭环项目目标需求的完成情况，分析实际差距及其原因，并给出未来阶段的调整计划 |
中期进度考核文档评级标准
| 内容要求 | 对应等级 |
|---|---|
| 项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，能够深入并找到问题根因，对于与规划不一致的地方能够给出未来阶段的调整计划。计划清晰可行，分析方法具有一定的创新性和先进性，能够为其他战队的分析提供有效的参考价值。 | S |
| 项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。进度达到规划标准，对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，能够深入并找到问题根因，对于与规划不一致的情况能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划清晰可行。 | A |
| 项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。进度基本达到规划标准，对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的情况能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划可行性合格。 | B |
| 项目文档内容有少量缺失或与内容要求存在一定偏离。进度与规划标准存在少量差距，对比赛季初的规划内容，能够分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的情况能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划可行性存在少量问题。 | C |
| 项目文档内容缺失严重或与内容要求偏离较大，进度与规划标准差距较大，项目进展赛季初规划内容较大，未能正确分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的情况不能给出未来阶段的调整计划。 | D |
Mid-term Progress Documentation Assessment Criteria
| Document Type | Section | Display Content |
|---|---|---|
| Project Document | Progress Report (with updates) | 1. Update the actual progress of robot development, complete the review of key milestones set in Season Planning, summarize the root causes for the gap, and propose follow-up plans. 2. Prepare the schedule for other tasks (such as site set-up, tool debugging, etc.) to be completed 3. Update the manpower distribution plan (the number of people and time to be allocated for each module) |
| Project Analysis | 1. Update project tracking by monitoring the progress of each module in the Season Planning during the implementation of specific solutions, reviewing the completion of project objectives and requirements, analyzing actual gaps and their causes, and providing adjustment plans for the next phase. 2. Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the progress in addressing various issues, track and evaluate the resolution of anticipated problems outlined in Season Planning, regularly update the project issues and risks list, and perform in-depth analysis and develop solutions for newly identified issues. 3. Develop reliability test plans for each project, test the reliability of each project based on actual match scenarios, and ensure robots do not encounter stability issues during official matches. |
Mid-term Progress Documentation Rating Criteria
| Content Requirements | Rating |
|---|---|
| The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress is provided, along with in-depth root cause analysis. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations. The updated plan is clear and feasible. The analysis uses innovative and sophisticated methods and is highly instructive for other teams. | S |
| The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. The progress goes as planned. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress is provided, along with in-depth root cause analysis. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, and the updated plan is clear and feasible. | A |
| The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. The progress basically goes with the plan. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress, as well as causes, is provided. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, and the updated plan is basically feasible. | B |
| The Project Documents have minor omissions or deviations from content requirements. There are minor gaps between the progress and the plan. An analysis of the gaps and causes is provided. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, but the updated plan has a few feasibility issues. | C |
| The Project Documents have significant omissions or deviations from content requirements. The project’s progress deviates significantly from the initial plan, and no analysis of the actual gaps and causes is provided or the provided analysis is inaccurate. In addition, no adjustments to fill the gaps are proposed for future operations. | D |