RMUC 2026 完整形态考核文档评审细则 Final Documentation Assessment Criteria
目录：技术评审 Technical Assessment / 历史资料 Archives / RMUC 2026 技术评审 Technical Assessment / RMUC 2026 完整形态考核 Final Robot Assessment / RMUC 2026 完整形态考核文档评审细则 Final Documentation Assessment Criteria
来源：https://bbs.robomaster.com/wiki/20204847/839183
源站更新：2025-12-10T16:39:56.000+00:00
抓取：2026-10-27T02:58:06.194Z

注意：以下细则仅供参考，具体内容以技术评审环节所采用的最新版模板为准。

Note: The following guidelines are for reference only. The definitive requirements are those set out in the latest template applicable to the relevant technical assessment stage.

完整形态考核文档评审要求

文档类型版块展示内容

技术方案详细描述机器人设计制作的主要思路、实现的技术方案、战场战术定位概要说明、技术方案实验记录等。具体内容及模板后续更新。

项目文档成本报告1、详细介绍本赛季经费相关情况、预算经费、已使用经费数量、当赛季后续经费规划
2、结合支出流水表、赛季规划中“团队预算”等内容，深入分析成本异常（超支/结余）的原因和解决方案

项目分析1、更新项目跟踪，对比之前环节中的项目计划，在具体方案执行过程中跟踪闭环各模块的进度，闭环项目目标需求的完成情况，分析实际差距及其原因，并给出未来阶段的调整计划
2、闭环分析各问题解决进展，针对之前环节中预期要解决的问题进行跟踪分析，同时更新项目问题与风险清单，针对新增问题进行深入分析并制定解决方案

支出流水表详细记录团队已支出的流水，包含花费的类别、金额、其他情况等。
注：记录应详细且清晰，可追溯实际花费情况，分析花费情况。

兵种BOM表完整、详实地记录当前已有的兵种零件清单，并进行清晰的模块划分。

完整形态考核技术方案评级标准

内容对应等级

技术方案内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。内容详实，方案内容有较好的技术深度，技术方案较赛事生态过往内容具有较高的突破性，能够支撑一台性能优越的机器人的功能实现，对于参赛队传承和其他参赛队有较高的参考价值。S

技术方案内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。内容详实，方案内容有较好的技术深度，技术方案较赛事生态过往内容具有一定的突破性，能够支撑一台性能良好的机器人的功能实现，对于参赛队传承和其他参赛队有参考价值。A

技术方案内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。内容详实，方案内容有较好的技术深度，能够支撑机器人的完整赛场常用功能的实现，对于参赛队传承和其他参赛队少量参考价值。B

技术方案内容有少量缺失或与内容要求存在一定偏离，内容较为简略，方案内容较为基础，能够支撑机器人的基础功能实现。C

技术方案内容缺失严重或与内容要求偏离较大，内容过于笼统或浮于表面，技术深度严重不足。D

完整形态考核项目文档评级标准

内容对应等级

项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。各项记录详实、条理清晰,对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，能够深入并找到问题根因，对于与规划不一致的地方能够给出未来阶段的调整计划。计划清晰可行，项目分析方法、成本控制方法、各项记录方法等具有一定的创新性和先进性，能够为其他战队的分析提供有效的参考价值。S

项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。各项记录详实、条理清晰,对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，能够深入并找到问题根因，对于与规划不一致的地方能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划清晰可行。A

项目文档内容按照内容要求撰写，完整无遗漏。各项记录较为详实,对比赛季初的规划内容，能正确详细分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的地方能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划可行性合格。B

项目文档内容有少量缺失或与内容要求存在一定偏离。各项记录较为笼统或有一定缺失,对比赛季初的规划内容，能分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的地方能够给出未来阶段的调整计划，计划可行性存在少量问题。C

项目文档内容缺失严重或与内容要求偏离较大，各项记录较为缺失或与战队实际情况严重不符，对比赛季初的规划内容，未能正确分析实际差距及原因，对于与规划不一致的地方不能给出未来阶段的调整计划。D

Final Documentation Assessment Criteria

Document TypeSectionDisplay Content

Technical ProposalDetailed descriptions of the robots’ design concepts, technical proposal, brief outline of tactical positioning, technical proposal experiment records, etc. The specific details and templates are to be updated.

Project DocumentsCost Report1. Provide details about costs
for this season, including budget, money already spent, and the subsequent
budget plans.
2. Analyze in depth the reasons for cost imbalances (overrun/surplus) based on the
"Expenditure Record" and the “Budget Report” section in the Season Plan. Put forward solutions based on the analysis.

Project Analysis1. Updated project tracking:
compare current progress with prior section project plans, monitor the progress
of each closed-loop module during implementation of the specific proposal,
assess completion of final project objectives and requirements, analyze actual
gaps and their causes, and provide adjustment plans for future phases.
2. Analyze the progress of problem-solving in a closed-loop manner, track and
assess issues identified in previous sections, continuously update the project
issue and risk list, and conduct in-depth analysis and develop solutions for
any new issues that arise.

Expenditure Record1. Make a record of the team’s
expenditures, including detailed information such as the types and amount of
the expenses.
2. The record should be thorough and clear, in which the costs are traceable and
should be analyzed.

Robot BOM RecordRecord the robot parts that are currently available in full and in detail. Divide them into modules for a clearer view.

Technical Proposal Rating Criteria

Content RequirementsRating

The Technical Proposal is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Technical Proposal is detailed and demonstrates great technical sophistication. It is revolutionary compared with proposals submitted for the previous editions of the competition, and can support the team in building robots with superior performance. The proposal is highly instructive for new team members and other teams.S

The Technical Proposal is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Technical Proposal is detailed and demonstrates great technical sophistication. It is innovative compared with proposals submitted for the previous editions of the competition, and can support the team in building robots with good performance. The proposal is instructive for new team members and other teams.A

The Technical Proposal is written in accordance with requirements and is complete without any omissions or missing information. The Technical Proposal is detailed and demonstrates great technical sophistication. It is sufficient for realizing all the common functionalities of a robot in the competition. The proposal is helpful for new team members and other teams.B

The Technical Proposal has minor omissions or deviations from the content requirements. The content is relatively brief and basic, but it can still support the realization of the robot’s basic functionalities.C

The Technical Proposal has significant omissions or deviations from the content requirements. The content is overly general or superficial, and lacks technical sophistication.D

Project Documents Rating Criteria

Content RequirementsRating

The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. The records are detailed and clearly organized. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress is provided, along with in-depth root cause analysis. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations. The updated plan is clear and feasible. The project analysis, cost control, and recording use innovative and sophisticated methods and are highly instructive for other teams.S

The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. The records are detailed and clearly organized. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress is provided, along with in-depth root cause analysis. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, and the updated plan is clear and feasible.A

The Project Documents are written in accordance with requirements and are complete without any omissions or missing information. The records are reasonably detailed. A thorough and accurate analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress and the causes is provided. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, and the updated plan is basically feasible.B

The Project Documents have minor omissions or deviations from content requirements. The records are not detailed or complete. An analysis of the gaps between the initial plan and actual progress and the causes is provided. In addition, the plan is adjusted to fill the gaps for future operations, but the updated plan has a few feasibility issues.C

The Project Documents have significant omissions or deviations from content requirements. The records are obviously incomplete or do not match the team’s actual situation. No analysis of the gaps between the actual situation and the initial plan, as well as the causes, is provided or the provided analysis is inaccurate. In addition, no adjustments to fill the gaps are proposed for future operations.D